Talk:Mammalian eye

	This article is part of WikiProject Animal anatomy, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to animal anatomy apart from human anatomy. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Animal anatomy. This project is an offshoot of WikiProject AnimalsAnimal anatomyWikipedia:WikiProject Animal anatomyTemplate:WikiProject Animal anatomyAnimal anatomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is this article necessary?

Seems to me that Evolution of the eye and Eye are necessary, as well as the detail articles such as Retina. But I can't see any use for both Human eye and Mammalian eye; they overlap too much. Should perhaps Human eye be merged into this one? - Hordaland (talk) 14:31, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mammalian eye. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.lx040-001.gsbme.unsw.edu.au/~greggs/eye_web/anatomy.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060927122539/http://www.clinica-cotero.es/i/2-1-1.htm to http://www.clinica-cotero.es/i/2-1-1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:38, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mammalian eye. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080920140056/http://www.e-sunbear.com/anatomy_02.html to http://www.e-sunbear.com/anatomy_02.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:31, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Mammalian vision into Mammalian eye

Seemed to be carved out of Mammalian eye for an unexplained reason. The account that created it has been globally locked for extensive abuse. scope_creep^Talk 16:23, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose For the 2nd. One is a process, another is another organ in the body. Completely different knowledge domains. scope_creep^Talk 23:00, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this article surprisingly human-centric?

Guys. This is an article about eyes in mammals yet why does this article still mention human exclusive stuff?

If you want to put human only information go to human eye because this is an article on mammals, not humans.

This is ridiculous. We need to fix this. LoverOfAllAnimalsActivist (talk) 10:34, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]