Jump to content

Talk:Mamilla Mall/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GGT (talk · contribs) 22:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have read the article and found the read truly enjoyable, congratulations on your beautiful work here! Regarding a few very minor concerns that I have, I will make a few bold changes to proceed with the review. --GGT (talk) 22:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Location, history and retail sections: All in compliance with WP:WIAGA.
  • Exhibitions and events: Was concerned with the use of blogs here, but the same content is verified by other reliable sources, which I would say is enough alone.
  • Attempted terror attack: In compliance with WP:WIAGA. I would suggest this section to be incorporated into the history section, but I can imagine the rationale with its separation, as the history section is more concerned with the development of the mall/its site.

--GGT (talk) 22:40, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citations to reliable sources:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

This nomination has passed, congratulations! A very thorough, fine and interesting piece of work, with extensive illustration of the article. Thank you for the enjoyable read --GGT (talk) 22:45, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Yoninah (talk) 17:33, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]