Talk:Mamie Eisenhower/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Orson12345 (talk · contribs) 21:05, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
here for what they are not)
Good to go for to be listed as one of the GAs.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Hello! Very well written article, sources are good and extensive, images meet the criteria, and overall just a good article. Meets all the GA rules. I’m happy to approve this article for GA status, great work!--Orson12345 (Talk • Contribs) 21:06, 8 October 2022 (UTC)