Talk:Malvern Link railway station

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Worcestershire Low‑importance

	Worcestershire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Worcestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Worcestershire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WorcestershireWikipedia:WikiProject WorcestershireTemplate:WikiProject WorcestershireWorcestershire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Coordinate error

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for Malvern Link 52.12581,-2.31955 — 90.192.9.117 (talk) 20:12, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed — TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 17:28, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PROD

I came here because this article had been flagged in a project page as the subject of a PROD. Many much less significant stations have articles, also many defunct ones. There is thus no reason for not retaining this one. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:11, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My main difficulty with the article is with the form of the succession box, which implies that there are two lines through the station, whereas there is only one line but used by two services. Since this is set up from a special "rail line" template rather than the standard "s-start" series, I do not know how to rectify this. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:19, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(a) all railway stations in Great Britain which are open should have their own articles (even one-train-a-week stations like Denton), so the PROD was unjustified; (b) {{rail line two routes}}. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:49, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Malvern Link railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130707074106/http://www.worcestershire.gov.uk/cms/transport-and-highways/transport-schemes/worcester-transport-strategy/malvern-link-station.aspx to http://www.worcestershire.gov.uk/cms/transport-and-highways/transport-schemes/worcester-transport-strategy/malvern-link-station.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:01, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]