Talk:Malouf syndrome

Peer Review

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 June 2024 and 17 August 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): HHK 26, Alisakoay, Jlaguer, W. La, Future UCSF PharmD (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Lkhoshniatrad, Lyishida, Jahanif, Nkalajian.

— Assignment last updated by Health Economics and Policy (talk) 21:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Lorraine’s Peer Review

· Do the group’s edits substantially improve the article as described in the Wikipedia peer review “Guiding framework”?

The group’s edits substantially improve the article. The group has added edits to the article that can enhance the reader’s understanding of the disease with a neutral perspective. The structure of the article is clear and easy to follow.

· Has the group achieved its overall goals for improvement?

The group achieved its overall goals for improvement. The group’s edits made the article more reader-friendly by reorganizing the structure of the article and rephrasing some parts of the original article. They added new information to each section of the article that is not difficult to read. When including medical terminology, they clearly explained or defined the terms to allow for readers to be able to follow along.

· Does the draft submission reflect a neutral point of view?

The draft submission reflects a neutral point of view. It discusses what Malouf syndrome is and how it can be managed as a disease without swaying the readers to any one way of thinking. The group used reliable sources to back up the information that was added.   Lyishida (talk) 17:01, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Farnaz's Peer Review

- Do the group’s edits substantially improve the article as described in the Wikipedia peer review “Guiding framework”?

The group's edits substantially improved the article. Prior to the edits, there was a lot less substantial information and now there is a complete picture of Malouf syndrome. The article is also easy to follow.

- Has the group achieved its overall goals for improvement?

Yes the group achieved its goals for improvement since each person did their part to provide complete information in their respective sections. Each section is easy to understand and contains quality information and data.

- Are the claims included verifiable with cited secondary sources that are freely available?

Not all sources are freely available. There at least four sources that are not available. Jahanif (talk) 00:00, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Nareg’s Peer Review

· Do the group’s edits substantially improve the article as described in the Wikipedia peer review “Guiding framework”?

Yes, the group’s edits substantially improve the article. Yes, there is a clear outline and of the article. The article maintains a neutral balance. Statements are backed with credible citations.

· Has the group achieved its overall goals for improvement?

Yes, the group achieved its overall goals for improvement. It appears at the group expanded on the case studies that were mentioned in the article. Additionally, there is an expansion of definitions of symptoms and other various terminology that were not previously self-explanatory. Future has also been addressed.

· Are the edits formatted consistent with Wikipedia’s manual of style?

yes, the edits format consisted with Wikipedia manual style. There was a lead section that was easy to understand. There is a clear structure and logical progression of clear headers with important related topics of interest. A balance coverage and neutral content is evident. Reliable resources have been used. Due to the rarity of the disease, some citations may have been less than ideal for Wikipedia, however, they still provide important insight and add credible referencing to the article.

02:41, 1 August 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nkalajian (talk • contribs)

Group 15 Malouf Syndrome Goals/Plan

Proposed plan:

Our plan for editing this article is to expand on the case studies that are mentioned in the article. We will add details about these cases that were pivotal to establishing the diagnosis of Malouf syndrome without including details that add any sort of bias or support for the research that was done. The purpose of including these details is solely informative and not to sway anyone in any direction. We also plan to break down the signs and symptoms as there are several, and they are difficult to understand. We plan to include definitions of the symptoms that are not self-explanatory along with including links to other Wikipedia articles to allow the readers to easily understand the descriptions and to easily toggle to additional information should they choose. We also plan to include future research if we are able to find any new topics that are being studied to contribute to the development of a diagnosis criteria or a treatment plan. Lastly, we hope to refine the treatment and medications section so that readers are able to understand the bigger picture of what each medication does even without any previous knowledge of the medications. In addition, if we are able to add images, we will do so if appropriate.