Talk:Mallow General Hospital

Hospitals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Ireland Start‑class Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Mallow General Hospital be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Waiting times section

I have tagged this section with {{undue}} as I believe repeating in such a way that the waiting times for Mallow General Hospital are unavailable give undue weight to that fact. Codf1977 (talk) 16:04, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. It is factual and does not suggest anything negative or positive about MGH. It is not an indictment of the hospital. There is no suggestion they did anything wrong; there are perfectly benign reasons for data to be unavailable. Leaving the sub-sections in situ with unavailable in place of the data acts as a flag for future editors to add the information as it becomes available. It also maintains the format that is reproduced in other articles on HSE hospitals. I have added in the most recent data I could find and presume the undue tag can now be removed? Best, GeneralBelly (talk) 16:14, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Listing it more than once does imply undue weight, and it has been removed. Codf1977 (talk) 16:26, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for removing it. Best, GeneralBelly (talk) 16:31, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mallow General Hospital. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:42, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]