Talk:Malicious Damage Act 1861

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Extent

The original text of this article said that this Act was extended to Canada and to Trinidad and Tobago but did not give any sources. Could someone either confirm or deny this with details? James500 (talk) 13:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1827 Act

This Act does not have a statutory short title. I am not sure if it should be labelled as the Malicious Injuries Act 1827, the Malicious Injuries to Property Act 1827 or anything else. James500 (talk) 13:34, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Malicious Damage Bill 1964

This may be relevant http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1964/jun/23/malicious-damage-bill James500 (talk) 13:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To do

Amdendments other than repeals in E, W, NI?
Repeals in E, W, NI done but may need to be redone section by section
Repeals and amendments in ROI
Case law
Derivation of sections from Davis