Talk:Malibu Boats

Tennessee Low‑importance

	Tennessee portal Malibu Boats is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Malibu Boats is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Move, not controversial. Parsecboy (talk) 21:57, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have been working with diligence on this page for the last week. While not a journalist, I am an educated person, and I have strived to represent Malibu Boats, an American company that builds boats for the waterski and wakeboard industry. I am not employed by Malibu Boats nor any other company in the boating industry, I have no Conflict of Interest here. I have used well published information as the basis of the content, and have cited my sources. I have strived to present the article in a neutral point of view.
I did try to create this page last week, but I admittedly did not follow the guidelines and necessary rules that are demanded by Wikipedia now that it has gotten so big. It was an attempt to create a stub for later expansion, but I admit it was underwhelming and did not do a good job of following the prescribed formatting and source citation rules. A result from last weeks creation was that it was deleted while I was working on it (with a collegue) and we couldn't understand why it was deleted, so I recreated it. The administrators locked the title from being created subsequently.

The suggestion was given on my talk page that a better way to create articles for wiki was to create it on a personal sandbox page, and when you have perfected it, to the point its ready for publishing to request a move. I appreciate the advice and tips the administrators of wiki have given me to help me conform to the rules and guidelines.

I am proposing that the article I have worked on for the last week in my personal sandbox [1] is now ready to be published and be moved to a page called "Malibu" or "Malibu Boats"
Tjinkc (talk) 18:50, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Advert date=August 2017

This article sounds like it was taken straight from a company press release. It either needs to be rewritten with a neutral point of view or deleted. The only reference is the company's website.

As an example, this is the first line on the referenced page: "In 1982, six California friends channeled their shared passion for waterskiing into designing and building a new wave of ski boats."

The first line of the History on the article: "In 1982, a group of six friends who shared a common passion for water skiing decided to start building custom ski boats in a small shop in Merced, California"

I have completely rewritten the article with scrupulous attention to sourcing of claims (and have gotten rid of spammy sentences like that). I believe this resolves the issue. Cheers! bd2412 T 19:09, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]