Talk:Male infertility crisis

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Reproductive medicine task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Men's Issues

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Men's Issues, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Men's Issues articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Men's IssuesWikipedia:WikiProject Men's IssuesTemplate:WikiProject Men's IssuesMen's Issues articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2020.

Added additional content

Added new content with various sections. Usage of the term. History and development of the issue. Different viewpoints and responses.

Running4uni (talk) 02:39, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

China?

See also this FT report (alas, paywalled) about similar problems in China: https://www.ft.com/content/d4b5325c-abad-11e6-ba7d-76378e4fef24

This Newsweek article also mentions China and Japan, but without giving sources: https://www.newsweek.com/2017/09/22/male-infertility-crisis-experts-663074.html

-- The Anome (talk) 11:24, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Holy shit

Holy shit, you guys. Who wrote this article? They can’t possibly be a native English speaker. Subject/verb tense disagreements, tautologies, and unnecessary repetition abound. This whole thing is a friggin’ dumpster fire. It’s honestly so bad that I think it’s going to be the thing that finally spurs me to make an account and become a Wikipedia editor.

What the fuck do half these sentences even mean?? Additionally, lots of the assertions and statistics presented here are patently false (i.e., skewed in a way that minimizes the extent of the titular crisis).

How has this article remained so bad for so long?! The mind boggles.

Regards,

A Wikipedian now, I guess — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.15.33.139 (talk • contribs) 03:58, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@107.15.33.139:: Your edits seem good (and are much appreciated) but why did you remove the references from that one statement? jp×g 03:59, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Sperme spermatogenèse délétionFertility2ComonsFL2.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

In response to the unnecessarily whiney comment above, I have gone through the article to reorganize ideas and correct grammar and syntax. A double-check is needed to ensure that the article flows more cleanly and that there is no abnormal grammar. I also noticed that this article lacks a standardized WP:ENGVAR (I'd recommend {{use British English}}), and cites non-WP:MEDRS. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:05, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]