Talk:Maladera formosae

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 1 May 2015 by reviewer Esquivalience (talk · contribs).

Beetles Low‑importance

	Insects portal Maladera formosae is within the scope of WikiProject Beetles, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to beetles. For more information, visit the project page.BeetlesWikipedia:WikiProject BeetlesTemplate:WikiProject Beetlesbeetle articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Major Additions

I made some major additions to the page, adding new sections for Geographic Range, Food Resources, Life History, Physiology, and Interactions with Humans and Livestock. Owen Guo (talk) 02:46, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Behavioral Ecology 2024

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 January 2024 and 25 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Owen Guo (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Owen Guo (talk) 19:50, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

The majority of my edits were shortening long sentences and combining others to make the page more concise. I would recommend reevaluating the importance of the lists of states in the Geographic Range section and the lists of crops in the Food Resources section. I don't believe that they entire list is necessary, though I would defer to one who knows more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tommytrope (talk • contribs) 04:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that the language was clear and that the article went into great detail. I think that there are additional important topics that are not covered on the page. I would be interested to learn more about the mating behaviors that the beetles experience or other behavioral interactions that they exhibit. For that reason, I added some sources that discussed oviposition in females to understand more about the behavioral habits of this species. I added some links as well to clarify the section that I added. I also agree that I'm not sure if the list of states is necessary in the Geographic Range section. I think that paragraph could benefit from just including general regions. The article overall was thorough and a great read! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anushkav18 (talk • contribs) 06:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

This entry was really well written! I just made some minor changes— I re-arranged some headings and took out some mentions of researchers/research since I don't think that needs to be explicitly stated. I believe some sections could use more citations (for example, there is a chunk of information in the geographic range section where the source is unclear, as well as the food resources and life history sections). I'm not sure if the Strawberry fields section is entirely necessary since a lot of it does not concern M. formosae, so maybe this could be cut down. Otherwise this was fun to read and it covered a great variety of topics! Esacchetti (talk) 15:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

I really enjoyed reading about the asiatic garden beetle. There was interesting information regarding the distincitoon between species and interactions with humans and livestock. There was good word flow and it was easy to read. I would include a little bit about the mating patterns of these beetles. There was discussion regarding how pheromones can be altered to drive out of beetles as pests. It would be interesting to learn more about the pheromones specific or unique to this beetle. Minor edits were made to describe some characteristics of the beetles better.Sbimal (talk) 21:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

I added some pictures to break up blocks of texts and provide engaging visuals for the reader. I also added a morphology section at the very beginning and added a physical description of the beetle here. I deleted the “Interspecies Distinction” section because it was mostly a physical description section that I thought would fit better in a “Morphology” section at the beginning. I rearranged the order of some sections, placing “Parental Care” directly after the “Life Cycle” section because I think it fits more logically there. I also made several brief grammatical corrections throughout the piece and changed some of the headings (ex: changed name of “Food resources” section to “Diet” and “Life History” to “Life Cycle”). Overall, I really enjoyed this article though! Geluck.t (talk) 20:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]