Talk:Malé Friday Mosque
Appearance
Malé Friday Mosque has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 18, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Malé Friday Mosque appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 January 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article was submitted or expanded as part of the 2015 Wikipedia Asian Month. |
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Malé Friday Mosque/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Doug Coldwell (talk · contribs) 16:01, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
I plan on reviewing this article.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 16:01, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. | This articles meets the Good Article criteria |
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:26, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:11, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Art and architecture good articles
- GA-Class Maldives articles
- Mid-importance Maldives articles
- WikiProject Maldives articles
- GA-Class Islam-related articles
- Mid-importance Islam-related articles
- GA-Class Mosque-related articles
- Mosques task force articles
- WikiProject Islam articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- 2015 Wikipedia Asian Month Contributions