This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida
A fact from Mako (roller coaster) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 October 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that upon its completion in 2016 at SeaWorld Orlando, Mako became the tallest, longest, and fastest roller coaster in the Orlando area of Florida?
"Upon completion, Mako became an anchor attraction to the new park area themed to sharks in general, and is located adjacent to SeaWorld's previously existing shark attractions, such as the Shark Encounter aquarium and its attached "Sharks Underwater Grill" restaurant." - I would reword and split this sentence in two: "Upon completion, Mako became an anchor attraction to the new shark-themed park area. It is located adjacent to SeaWorld's previously existing shark attractions, such as the Shark Encounter aquarium and its attached "Sharks Underwater Grill" restaurant."
"Touted as the tallest, longest, and fastest roller coaster in the Orlando theme-park market, Mako opened on June 10, 2016 to acclaimed reviews from many guests." - I would recommend changing "acclaimed" to "positive" as a more neutral term.
First, thank you very much :D – Second the awards in the box section are common among roller coaster articles, I'm not sure if that would disrupt the flow of that (especially because the Golden Ticket Awards (GTA) box is a template). Adog104Talk to me17:40, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Just two things before it's done. (1) Unfortunately I cannot find a archive link for R. 35 nor anything on its current website, although I could replace the review with another one from The Mirror/ Theme Park Insider without possibly detracting from the articles other positive reviews (or just omit it from the article). (2) Where articles in references can be wikilinked, should they be linked again when they have been linked once before (such as with the Miami Herald articles where there's four separate references within the article)? Again thank you! Adog104Talk to me20:16, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Adog104, usually yes they all get linked because references can be viewed one at a time (such as clicking on the reference link in the article). And yes, unfortunately, I would remove or replace the reference and associated text. « Gonzo fan2007(talk) @ 04:41, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]