Talk:Makin Review
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Work needed
[edit]I've created this article as I believe the Makin Review is sufficiently notable to have its own article. The review received considerable media coverage and led to the resignation of Justin Welby. More work is needed, particularly an accurate summary of the report's conclusions, with appropriate citations. Over to the community! SmilingFace (talk) 20:00, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- My only concern is whether this is the most sensible division of the articles. There was previously the Ruston Report (1982), the Coltart Report (1997), the Channel 4 documentary (2017), Andrew Graystone's book (2021), the Scripture Union Report (2021), the Titus Trust culture review and answers to questions (2021), and the Winchester College review (2022). I'm wondering whether having an article specifically on one of those reviews is the appropriate context, versus having all this information in the John Smyth article, or perhaps in an article about the investigations and reports into Smyth's abuse? It feels like these other issues get treated rather briefly in this article, which may perhaps lack context (for example, Andrew Graystone pops up in a later section as making a response to the report, but without any previous context on his role). On the other hand the Smyth article could get very long given the sheer number of enquiries. TSP (talk) 12:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)