Talk:Major League Baseball tie-breaking procedures

Baseball Mid‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

History info

Page Major League Baseball tie-breaking procedures's history before mid-March 2012 has been split of and moved to Major League Baseball tie-breaking procedures (1995-2011). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:51, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

new playoff format

The new playoff format, confirmed on march 2, 2012, results in new tie breaking procdures. For a start, teams from the same divison can now play each other in the same round. Second, the phrase "the wildcard," has become ambigious since there are two wildcards. Third, the extra wildcard also changes how ties would be broken (whether statistics are used, such as head to head or whether a tie breaker game for the second wildcard is needed)in many different situations. Crd721 (talk) 06:51, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mixed 3-Way Tie for SECOND wildcard?

The article explains what happens in a "Mixed 3-way tie" with the FIRST wildcard team. (The two teams from the same division would play each other for the division title, with the loser dropping to the second wildcard spot.) But what happens if this circumstance arises in a tie with the SECOND wildcard team? Would the loser of the divisional game be eliminated from the postseason or would they still have a chance to become the second wildcard?

In other words, does the result of game 163 for a division title count towards the standings for Wild Card spots? In the circumstance described in the article, the answer was yes, but is this the case in all circumstances? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.188.10.14 (talk) 23:15, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

3 WAY TIE FOR 2 WILD CARD SPOTS

In a situation where there is a three way tie between non division winners and there is no other non division winner with a better record claiming wild card 1; a tiebreaker eliminating 1 of the 3 teams will follow. Based on a group head to head record. Teams A B and C will be created. Team B will travel to team A. The winner wins wild card one. The loser will go to team C. The winner of that game wins wild card two. After those 2 games, wild card teams one and two will play each other in the wild card round . Can be an" A\B rematch". This information was provided to me by the MLB Commissioners office . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.113.196.62 (talk) 20:30, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question

The team with the best record in the final 82 games of the season (providing the game added is not between the tied teams), extending backward until the tie is broken (since teams in the same division play each other as many as 19 times, this step is guaranteed to break the tie. Interleague games are skipped and ignored in this process.)

Why does this step guaranteed break the tie?

For example 2 teams (call it A and B) from 2 different divisions are tied. Suppose A and B split their series. Suppose A and B won every game against other teams. Then wouldn't both teams have a 100% record in all cases no matter how many games it is gone back (since games against each other is not included)? 24.212.195.135 (talk) 03:48, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Major League Baseball tie-breaking procedures. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150518045654/http://m.mlb.com/news/article/38029316/playoff-tiebreaker-rules to http://m.mlb.com/news/article/38029316/playoff-tiebreaker-rules

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:07, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Date

The rules changed in 2022. There are no longer extra games to break a tie. 24.177.220.121 (talk) 18:08, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]