Talk:Maitland McDonagh

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 March 2021. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Michael Cockram, Ramon Ramirez (2 March 2021). "Is this Wikipedia editor who deadnamed a trans celebrity a high-profile film critic? The curious case of Tenebrae". Daily Dot. Archived from the original on 3 March 2021. Retrieved 4 March 2021.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Maitland McDonagh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090406025027/http://www.maitlandm.com/ to http://maitlandm.com/
Corrected formatting/usage for https://theasc.com/magazine/dvd.archive.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.channel4.com/programmes/the-100-greatest-sexy-moments

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:24, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

I've tagged this article for being overreliant on questionable and self-published sources. The tone, especially the lead, is overly promotional. I've kept the COI tag as the fruits of the COI editor persist in the article, which contain long stretches of unsourced and promotional material. Coretheapple (talk) 22:06, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About to post my thorough re-edit

Hi. Like I did at David Del Valle, I did a pretty complete overhaul of the article, adding many non primary source citations like from The New York Times, Entertainment Weekly, the Minnesota University Press, Fangoria and others. There were tags for "multiple issues" including "primary sources", "additional citations needed", "close connection" and "may not be reliable sources". I think this overhaul added citations to all the "citation needed" tags, and I made sure to give "access-date=May 29, 2023" so that everyone can double-check my work. I wanted to let everyone know in case it wasn't OK to remove the box. I think it probably was OK but if not please fix my fixes or let me know. I'm not on here a lot. Thank you everyone. - The Horror, The Horror (talk) 19:46, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]