Talk:Maine's 2nd congressional district
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Maine's 2nd congressional district article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Congressional District Image
[edit]Hello to any moderator.
Could you help me put an image of Maine's current congressional districts on this page? It is a map that has the district's current borders.
Here is the URL: http://www.mapresources.com/media/catalog/product/m/e/me-usa-895628_comp.jpg
Thanks a ton,
--- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.195.56.56 (talk) 05:05, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- For technical and policy reasons, it is not possible to use images from external websites on Wikipedia. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request an upload. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. Dwpaul Talk 05:07, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Maine's 2nd congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100423082228/http://bioguide.congress.gov/biosearch/biosearch.asp to http://bioguide.congress.gov/biosearch/biosearch.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:34, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
RCV
[edit]I feel like there's room for clarifying the sentence "In 2018 the district became the first in the United States to have the winner decided through ranked choice voting, after a referendum in 2016 changed Maine's electoral system from first-past-the-post to ranked choice." in the current version of the article. Ranked choice voting also decided various other elections, including the ME-01 House election and the Senate election, held at the same time. The ME-02 election is different because it produced a winner different than the first-past-the-post winner - so I'll update the article to say that. Airbornemihir (talk) 06:04, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
2018 & 2020 Results
[edit]Why is the 2018 House election box for "Recent election results" linking to Australia's system? Shouldn't it link to the general rank-choice voting article instead?
Also, the 2020 election for House and presidential races should be added as well. 2603:8000:A501:9B00:287E:F755:B609:ACF3 (talk) 04:10, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- Changed 2018 after no comment in response. 2600:1012:B047:F452:0:52:472E:E01 (talk) 01:54, 13 March 2021 (UTC)