Talk:Main Directorate for Reconnaissance

Germany High‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Intelligence / European / German Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Intelligence task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force

Espionage Low‑importance

	Main Directorate for Reconnaissance is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Status: Started, in progress, please review (Patrick 05:10, 16 May 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:MWolf.jpg

The image Image:MWolf.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --11:17, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grave mistake

In the description of the activities is named "...as well as the so-called "Active Measures" (distributing false intelligence)...". As to my knowledge, this (spreading desinformation) was only a small fraction of the 'Active Measures'. Actually, AM was simply the term for Covert operations in general, meaning every secretly conducted operation - which, by the way, funnily does not appear at all in the paragraph, though it was an important field of work for the HVA. I dont have sources present, but I would strongly suggest that the main authors check that issue. 217.7.150.122 (talk) 11:22, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, why not look into Active measures? Definition: "...ranged from media manipulations to special actions involving various degrees of violence. (...) They included disinformation, propaganda, counterfeiting official documents, assassinations, and political repression, such as penetration in churches, and persecution of political dissidents." This clearly falls under the definition of "Covert Operations" and goes far beyond spreading "false intelligence". 217.7.150.122 (talk) 11:30, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

English translation of HV A

The BStU's website offers the translation "Main Directorate for Reconnaissance" here. Unless someone else has a more authoritative source, I will use this. As an aside, they also spell "HVA" as "HV A" but I think adding spaces to acronyms would sacrifice clarity.-Ich (talk) 14:38, 27 June 2014 (UTC) Also, when googling for both terms, I find a lot more using "Main Reconnaissance Administration", a handful of which would be considered reliable, or are (likely) directly influenced by the fact that Wikipedia used this translation. I feel most comfortable using the translation offered by a German federal agency that is responsible for maintaining the Stasi's records.-Ich (talk) 14:53, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Academic research (like work from Kristie Macrakis) uses BStU, HVA, and MfS. Since our sources are academic in nature I wouldn't rely on Google results to define the "common name." Chris Troutman (talk) 16:26, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Main Directorate for Reconnaissance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070613205750/http://www.hidden-places.de/hp/index.cfm?aufbau=objekt&obj_id=98 to http://www.hidden-places.de/hp/index.cfm?aufbau=objekt&obj_id=98

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:09, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Before the Warsaw Pact

The opening section of this article has a sentence copied verbatim from the source it cites, which is "It provided up to 80 percent of all information about NATO countries before the Warsaw Pact, according to the CIA." But the Warsaw Pact predates the HVA by quite a few months. Is this quote complete rubbish, or does it "before" changing to e.g. "to"? Is there a better source that can clarify this? 5.198.76.62 (talk) 21:16, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]