Talk:Mailsort

Many new selection codes exist from today, 29 sept 2010, and most of the old ones are invalid. I'm removing the existing table for now. 195.11.103.126 (talk) 14:46, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update for new 2007 database?

I've made a few minor corrections and additions here but the residue selection codes shown (which make up quite a large section of the article) are now out of date since the introduction of the 2007 database in July this year. I'm initially reluctant to spend time updating them because I'm not sure how useful this information is to a casual reader. Any thoughts? Andy Berry 21:55, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

> I was looking for a page on the numeric codes used for mail, but when I found the table, I was extremely confused. I am in the DT11 postcode area, but all my bulk mail has the number 51121, which does not exist according to the table.

A casual reader; 19.22, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

I've done the update now 91.84.175.27 (talk) 00:04, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

non-obvious characters

Please could this be clarified? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.140.57.113 (talk) 11:48, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mailsort obsolete as of April 2012

The Mailsort and Walksort products were dropped in April 2012 in favour of products branded Business Mail, Advertising Mail and Publishing Mail

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tim Boothby (talk • contribs) 16:25, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Above comment relocated from Category:Mailsort Obsolete as of April 2012 to here. Category pages are not intended for article feedback. — Richardguk (talk) 22:24, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mailsort was only rebranded in April 2012. The technical details as described in the article still apply to the Business Mail and other products. Walksort has disappeared though. Periglio (talk) 10:37, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why was it discontinued? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.151.103.159 (talk) 13:43, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]