Talk:Mahindra United FC

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football: India Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

On 17 August 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Mahindra United F.C. to Mahindra United FC. The result of the discussion was moved.

POV

I have removed the statement "Mahindra United currently is one of the top clubs in India, winning the 27th Federation Cup in 2005.", and replaced it with some statistics, which makes it less POV. I've also removed the reference to Barreto, because it said that he was "one of the top players in the NFL" without any fact to back it up. I have instead added a statement that names the club top scorer. Any objections? -Aabha (talk) 21:23, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mu logo sc.png

Image:Mu logo sc.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:23, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 18:40, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mahindra United. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100504014823/http://www.hindustantimes.com/Mahindra-United-to-disband-team/H1-Article1-537699.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/Mahindra-United-to-disband-team/H1-Article1-537699.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:51, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 August 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. per discussion consensus and title consistency. FYI to nominator, this should have been done as one single RM discussion, with all the titles listed. But it's easier to just go ahead and do the moves now. (non-admin closure) — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 10:42, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mahindra United F.C. → Mahindra United FC – Consistency with current naming conventions in Category:Football clubs in India , Category:Indian Super League teams and so on. Footwiks (talk) 06:40, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Giant Snowman 11:31, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - one of a mass number of nominations by this editor (at least 16 by my count?!) with no sources presented and no clear category convention to match. Giant Snowman 11:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Many Indian Football Club article titles have FC or SC or AC, But Some Indian Football Club article titles have F.C. or S.C. or A.C. So In order to unify disordered article titles, I requested many title moves. What's wrong with that? Footwiks (talk) 14:49, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support for consistency. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 20:53, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:54, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.