Jump to content

Talk:Mahanati

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mistakes in Mahanati

[edit]

-In the movie it was shown Savitri addressed S.V. Rangarao as "babai" (uncle) but in reality she addressed him as bava.

-In the movie it was shown Gemini Ganesh and Savitri had a very good relationship but in reality after the initial years of their marriage they had a very turbulent relationship which led to her excessive drinking and depression. Gemini Ganesh is a well known womanizer. Other than Savitri and his first wife he is known to have affairs with two more women. Actress Rekha is a product of one of these relationships.

-Movie seems to completely ignore her close relationship with other cinema families. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.82.227.63 (talk) 22:38, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dubbed

[edit]

@Kailash29792:@Ab207:Recently watched the Tamil version. The CBFC certificate states that the film is indeed dubbed.TamilMirchi (talk) 03:05, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TamilMirchi, then please revamp the article accordingly. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:20, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IPA

[edit]

@Ab207 Do you think IPA would be useful? I think maɦaːnaʈi is the one. Not quite sure though H:IPA-TE. -- DaxServer (talk) 18:48, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DaxServer, yeah. I think that's correct. This version had IPA, though its removed by an IP w/o explanation. -- Ab207 (talk) 05:11, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ab207 The edit Special:Diff/892425352 has removed the IPA. Do we need cites for IPAs as well? -- DaxServer (talk) 17:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ahh, you mentioned IP removed it w/o explanation. Didn't read the last part of the sentence 🙈 -- DaxServer (talk) 17:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@DaxServer: Oh, okay. Citation is not needed because its a directly derived from the Telugu source text, ie, film's title. -- Ab207 (talk) 17:36, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Mahanati/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 20:28, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:28, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • Non-free use rationale looks good.
  • Serial comma after Prakash Raj.
    • Fixed.
  • That's it here. Lead looks great.
    • Thanks :).

Plot and cast

[edit]
  • 648 words – plot passes WP:FILMPLOT.
  • "a year in coma" → "a year in a coma"
    • Fixed.
  • Cast looks good but I would use this template instead.
    • Done.

Production

[edit]
  • "researching about the actress" → "researching the actress"
  • "more of subconscious" → "more of a subconscious"
  • "her take up the role" → "her to take up the role"
  • Add a serial comma after "Chennai, Mysore".
  • "vitange" might be a typo. Replace it with "vintage".
    • Fixed all.

Themes and influences

[edit]
  • "interview to The Hindu" → "interview with The Hindu"
    • Fixed.
  • This section feels kinda short. I would try expanding it.

Music

[edit]
  • Make this a subsection in #Production – (WP:FILMMUSIC).
    • Done.
  • "called the album as Meyer's best work till date" → "called the album Meyer's best work to date"
    • Fixed.

Release

[edit]
  • Add a serial comma after Rangasthalam.
    • Fixed.
  • "through a different perspective" → "from a different perspective"
    • Fixed.
  • #Marketing might need to be removed per WP:TRAILER.

Reception

[edit]
  • "Savitri's story as a" → "Savitri's story a"
    • Fixed.
  • "three stars out five" → "three stars out of five"
    • Fixed.
  • #Box_office usually goes above #Critical_reception.
    • Done.

Legacy and accolades

[edit]
  • No issues in either of these sections.

References

[edit]
  • Sources are archived.

Progress

[edit]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk01:24, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: My third DYK nomination

Improved to Good Article status by Ab207 (talk). Self-nominated at 15:24, 9 June 2021 (UTC).[reply]