Talk:Mahanati
Mahanati has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 9, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Mahanati appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 June 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mistakes in Mahanati
[edit]-In the movie it was shown Savitri addressed S.V. Rangarao as "babai" (uncle) but in reality she addressed him as bava.
-In the movie it was shown Gemini Ganesh and Savitri had a very good relationship but in reality after the initial years of their marriage they had a very turbulent relationship which led to her excessive drinking and depression. Gemini Ganesh is a well known womanizer. Other than Savitri and his first wife he is known to have affairs with two more women. Actress Rekha is a product of one of these relationships.
-Movie seems to completely ignore her close relationship with other cinema families. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.82.227.63 (talk) 22:38, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Dubbed
[edit]@Kailash29792:@Ab207:Recently watched the Tamil version. The CBFC certificate states that the film is indeed dubbed.TamilMirchi (talk) 03:05, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- TamilMirchi, then please revamp the article accordingly. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:20, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
IPA
[edit]@Ab207 Do you think IPA would be useful? I think maɦaːnaʈi
is the one. Not quite sure though H:IPA-TE. -- DaxServer (talk) 18:48, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- DaxServer, yeah. I think that's correct. This version had IPA, though its removed by an IP w/o explanation. -- Ab207 (talk) 05:11, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Ab207 The edit Special:Diff/892425352 has removed the IPA. Do we need cites for IPAs as well? -- DaxServer (talk) 17:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ahh, you mentioned IP removed it w/o explanation. Didn't read the last part of the sentence 🙈 -- DaxServer (talk) 17:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- @DaxServer: Oh, okay. Citation is not needed because its a directly derived from the Telugu source text, ie, film's title. -- Ab207 (talk) 17:36, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ahh, you mentioned IP removed it w/o explanation. Didn't read the last part of the sentence 🙈 -- DaxServer (talk) 17:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Ab207 The edit Special:Diff/892425352 has removed the IPA. Do we need cites for IPAs as well? -- DaxServer (talk) 17:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Mahanati/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 20:28, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:28, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Infobox and lead
[edit]- Non-free use rationale looks good.
- Serial comma after Prakash Raj.
- Fixed.
- That's it here. Lead looks great.
- Thanks :).
Plot and cast
[edit]- 648 words – plot passes WP:FILMPLOT.
- "a year in coma" → "a year in a coma"
- Fixed.
- Cast looks good but I would use this template instead.
- Done.
Production
[edit]- "researching about the actress" → "researching the actress"
- "more of subconscious" → "more of a subconscious"
- "her take up the role" → "her to take up the role"
- Add a serial comma after "Chennai, Mysore".
- "vitange" might be a typo. Replace it with "vintage".
- Fixed all.
Themes and influences
[edit]- "interview to The Hindu" → "interview with The Hindu"
- Fixed.
- This section feels kinda short. I would try expanding it.
- Yeah, I felt the same here. Expanded it a bit, please have a look. -- Ab207 (talk) 09:37, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Music
[edit]- Make this a subsection in #Production – (WP:FILMMUSIC).
- Done.
- "called the album as Meyer's best work till date" → "called the album Meyer's best work to date"
- Fixed.
Release
[edit]- Add a serial comma after Rangasthalam.
- Fixed.
- "through a different perspective" → "from a different perspective"
- Fixed.
- #Marketing might need to be removed per WP:TRAILER.
- Removed mundane detailing, though I'd remove the section entirely if you insist. -- Ab207 (talk) 09:37, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Reception
[edit]- "Savitri's story as a" → "Savitri's story a"
- Fixed.
- "three stars out five" → "three stars out of five"
- Fixed.
- #Box_office usually goes above #Critical_reception.
- Done.
Legacy and accolades
[edit]- No issues in either of these sections.
References
[edit]- Sources are archived.
Progress
[edit]GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 01:24, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- ... that Mahanati is the highest-grossing South Indian film that featured a woman as its primary character? Source: Mahanati completes 50-day theatrical run, becomes highest grossing woman-led South Indian film
- ALT1:... that the 2018 film Mahanati was partly shot on film stock to match the Technicolor format used in the Indian films of the 1980s? Source: The making of Mahanati: Cinematographer Dani Sanchez-Lopez talks about recreating the life of Savitri
- Comment: My third DYK nomination
Improved to Good Article status by Ab207 (talk). Self-nominated at 15:24, 9 June 2021 (UTC).
- Became GA today (9 June). Long enough, with proper citations. No copyright violations seen. Hook 1 is mentioned inline with the reference in the article and is catchy, and I would prefer it over ALT 1. QPQ not required as it is the 3rd DYK of the author. No image. Seems good to go. Jupitus Smart 16:51, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Jupitus Smart, thank you for the review! -- Ab207 (talk) 17:12, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Became GA today (9 June). Long enough, with proper citations. No copyright violations seen. Hook 1 is mentioned inline with the reference in the article and is catchy, and I would prefer it over ALT 1. QPQ not required as it is the 3rd DYK of the author. No image. Seems good to go. Jupitus Smart 16:51, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Media and drama good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class film articles
- GA-Class Indian cinema articles
- Indian cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- GA-Class India articles
- Mid-importance India articles
- GA-Class India articles of Mid-importance
- GA-Class Andhra Pradesh articles
- High-importance Andhra Pradesh articles
- GA-Class Andhra Pradesh articles of High-importance
- WikiProject Andhra Pradesh articles
- Mid-importance Indian cinema articles
- GA-Class Indian cinema articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Indian cinema articles
- WikiProject India articles