This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama articles
I assume the reason this article is so poor is that the subject is obscure, and presumably only a handful of people have bothered to edit it. In particular the middle section reads like a legal argument - "we can conjecture that all of Rudolph’s upper and mid-level managers were submitting sabotage reports to the Nazi security apparatus, but did their workplace culture also condone physical attacks by engineers against enslaved laborers on the shop floor? The answer appears to be a qualified yes" - rather than an encyclopaedia, and the bulk of it isn't actually about Magnus Von Braun. In particular his post-war career is summed up in a single very short paragraph. And it uses loaded language throughout. I've taken the liberty of trimming the unambiguous irrelevancies, but this is inevitably going to be one of those articles where a single obsessive editor continually reinserts rubbish until they die of old age. Which is a battle I will win because I'm about thirty years younger than you. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 12:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
