Jump to content

Talk:Magnificat (Torri)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Magnificat (Torri)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Juliette Han (talk · contribs) 16:23, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Soon. Juliette Han (talk) 16:23, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Opening statement

[edit]

Hello, and come what may from this review, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. During the review, I may make copyedits, which I will limit to spelling correction and minor changes to punctuation (removal of double spaces and such). I will only make substantive edits that change the flow and structure of the prose if I previously suggested and it is necessary. The Nominator(s) should understand that I am a grammar pedant, and I will nitpick in the interest of prose quality. For responding to my comments, please use  Done,  Fixed, plus Added,  Not done,  Doing..., or minus Removed, followed by any comment you'd like to make. I will be crossing out my comments as they are redressed, and only mine. A detailed, section-by-section review will follow. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 04:13, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

[edit]
  • What do you think about adding a short explanation of who Pietro Torri was? Specifically, how he came to work for the Bavarian Elector and whatever became of him and his works.
  • [...] single continuo part for unspecified instrument(s) [..] Delete the parentheses here ("unspecified instruments").
  • [...] as tenth and last movement) The tenth and last movement.
  • [...] Bach P 195: Replace the colon with a semi-colon.

Referencing

[edit]

References are reliable, and cover the whole article. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 15:33, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA progress

[edit]

Article passes CopyVio scanner. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 15:33, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Images used on the article are relevant and free use or tagged. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 15:33, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.