Talk:Magnetostatics

Template:Electromagnetism_vs_Template:Electromagnetism2

I think the Electromagnetism template is too long. I created the alternative version shown in this article; see a more extended explanation at Talk:Electrostatics#Template:Electromagnetism_vs_Template:Electromagnetism2. Comments welcome!--DJIndica 04:45, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Magnetostatics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110629022541/http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Physics/ElectricityMagnetism/?view=usa&ci=9780198508090 to http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Physics/ElectricityMagnetism/?view=usa&ci=9780198508090

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:21, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Magnetostatics Definition

Article states it is the study of Magnetism "where the currents are steady.". I think this falsely implies non zero. The case of moving charges without current such as non moving permanent magnets should be included.

I feel saying "Where the currents are steady, or zero." is better.

Do you agree? Bill field pulse (talk) 21:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A zero current is a steady current. No need to clutter the intro. Constant314 (talk) 21:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only 6 letters and two spaces are needed in a rather long article. Bill field pulse (talk) 22:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]