Talk:Magic Circle Club

	Australia portal Magic Circle Club is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Magic Circle Club. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:20, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Copyvio?

I have been working on improving this article and have come across web page which seems to have sections of identical text as this article, suggesting a possible WP:COPYVIO, scoring a 75.8% score on Earwig's detector. However I was unable to determine the date of publication of the source to figure out whether they copied from here. Should this be tagged as Copyvio? Reader781 (talk) 00:11, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged this article. Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2024 February 1 Reader781 (talk) 00:36, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Wayback Machine only shows this page dating back to April 10 2021, whereas the content at issue goes back much further than that. The more likely explanation is that the external site copied from Wikipedia without attribution. I suggest removing the copyvio flag. RJ4 (talk) 01:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did look at Wayback Machine, but had considered the possibility that the page had existed before it was archived. However the evidence does seem to suggest of a copy from Wiki as you suggested. Thank you for bringing this to my attention, I will be removing the flags from the article and withdrawing the nomination from the list via strikethrough to preserve history. Reader781 (talk) 01:37, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]