Talk:Magic: The Gathering Pro Tour season 1998–99
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
PT Chicago - Rochester or Booster draft?
[edit]Kai Budde thinks that 1998 PT Chicago was booster draft, which caused two editors to disagree recently. The cited source, https://web.archive.org/web/19990220064811/http://www.wizards.com/Sideboard/PTChi98/Final_Results.html and http://web.archive.org/web/19990220142902/www.wizards.com/Sideboard/PTChi98/QDecks.html, do not say if it was Rochester draft or Booster draft. They do establish it was Tempest block at least from the card pool. One of Mark Rosewater's articles, [1], says that it was Urza's Saga booster draft. This can't be completely right, because of the card pool, and because Urza's Saga didn't release until the next month (Sep. for this PT, Oct. for Urza's Saga). But, it does indicate booster not Rochester draft. Sooo...what draft format was it? -- stillnotelf is invisible 16:55, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- Kai dug up http://web.archive.org/web/19990220034641/http://www.wizards.com/Sideboard/PTChi98/Draft_Overview.html, definitely booster, fixed. -- stillnotelf is invisible 17:41, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Magic: The Gathering Pro Tour season 1998–99. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://thedojo.net/news/DCI_Invitation_Policy.txt
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wizards.com/news/pressrelease.asp?19990809a
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:53, 27 May 2016 (UTC)