Talk:Magi Society
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Notability
[edit]Help is needed with this page, please. User Verbal removed secondary sources and citations that were inserted to provide proof of notability, then User Verbal added a label that the page was potentially not notable and a label that it needed secondary sources and citations.
In other words after editing out secondary sources, User Verbal labeled the page as not having secondary sources.
It is possible to post additional secondary sources to overcome User Verbal's objections, whatever they may be, but it is also possible that any secondary sources added to the page will be removed again unless there is assistance from a neutral party or administrator.
It is hoped that by using the talk page that we can come to consensus of what is needed to keep this page up here since the Magi Society is worthy of a page. They did publish three books through Hay House, a legitimate publisher. Thanks for any help in advance.Bambi is a dear (talk) 20:55, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
- Those were not Reliable Sources (RS) in the wikipedia sense. The wikipedia notability criteria are spelt out here: WP:NOTE. Please explain how this group meets these criteria, with reference to WP:RS. Thanks, Verbal chat 20:59, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
- I am the originator of this link and I want to thank VERBAL for his or her work on this article and response to the questions posed by Bambi is a dear. VERBAL, I can tell by reading your contribution history that you are sincere in your efforts to help articles to become worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia. I have much material I have yet to post that should certainly satisfy the Wiki standards to which you have kindly referred. I will be making changes and additions to the article in the next few days.Safesanctuary (talk) 01:16, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- Hello Verbal. I first found out about the Magi Society through the Trader’s World Magazine article published in early 2009. I am a stock trader and technical analyst. I have always been interested in finding and testing new methodologies for better forecasting stock prices. I was skeptical of the Magi Society at first – I have a degree in biology and never gave astrology a second thought. But I went to the Magi Society websites, found out that the Magi Society hated traditional astrology and had developed their own new form of astrology based on geometric patterns and I was fascinated; I thought it was worth testing. Now you know how I got involved. I have rewritten the article for Magi Society; I removed anything that is not backed up with “reliable sources” and added new material but only when reliable sources are documented. I will now go to the Wikipedia posting page and substitute this new material for the old but I will leave your tags on the article. When you have a chance, please review and let me know what you think; I’m sure I can rely on your judgment.. Thanks so much for your help.Safesanctuary (talk) 00:45, 26 July 2010 (UTC)