Talk:Maggie Grace

Maggie Grace has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 13, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Lost Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Lost task force.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Old pic

Here is the old pic, in case she gets really famous and we need to expand the article...

File:Maggiegrace.jpg

File name: maggiegrace.jpg

Character in Lost

I'm taking out the mention of her death in Lost as a spoiler warning (and it is a spoiler... i just got spoiled, having not yet gotten that far in the series) would look out of place in the article. Perhaps her death could be discussed on the Shannon character page. Ignus 00:41, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed it again. The biography page does not need details about the Shannon character. That's what we have the Shannon Rutherford page for. Baryonyx 07:43, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It is a spoiler, and should stay out of her article. Season 2 hasnt even started yet where I am and I just got spoiled by this talk page topic, hmph... Ban e s 15:04, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hold on, I am confused. The page says she would be killed off lost if she accepted the role in X Men 3, but the producers did kill her off and she is not in X men 3? Then why did the producers kill her off?

Indeed. I suppose they could have canned her out of spite, for a totally unknown reason, or she may be coming back some how - it's that kind of show. Regardless, the X-Men speculation should be documented, removed, or perhaps equivocated to "rumored." It's clear that she was desired for the role and in some kind of talks about it, but I haven't seen anything to verify the alleged ultimatum by the Lost producers. --RolandStJude 22:58, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should be altered. The Shadowcat article states "The film's first director Bryan Singer originally intended the role to go to Maggie Grace[5], but Page was cast when Brett Ratner succeeded Singer.[1]" and is sourced twice. Lhall 01:31, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Went ahead and edited that part, but the removed section should be added in again if someone can dig up a reference: "But the producers of Lost told her that if she took the role they would kill her off Lost, and so the role was given to Ellen Page." Lhall 16:00, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Should this YouTube video get a mention? [1]

Yeah I came here because of that... Very interesting.

"She is also returnig to Lost playing Shannon Rutherford. She is appearing in one episode." I took out this line because it's a spoiler.

Shannon is no longer in the show the last episode she appeared in was in 2007 called "Exposé". I read the reason why she was killed off because the character was only needed for so long. The same thing with her brother in the show. When the characters were created they were only created for "X" amount of episodes, same thing with characters like michelle rodriguez. Pwojdacz (talk) 13:17, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Biography assessment rating comment

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. Please feel free to put any comments or ask any questions on my talk page. -- GDon4t0 (talk to me...)

External Link #3

Can somebody explain why this link is on this page? It links to some teenager's website that has no mention of Maggie Grace. (Or if it does then I can't find it; the website is really annoying..) ~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.211.156.10 (talk) 07:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Maggie Grace/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Very good read. I was going to leave some comments, but I decided to just fix them myself. Just a few observations: in citation templates, you should use the work field (rather than publisher) for magazines, newspapers and journals; it read pretty well, but I noticed that there were several run-on sentences. Good job! -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 18:33, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Maggie Grace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:19, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Maggie Grace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:18, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]