Talk:Maen Llia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Wales

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

I am curious as to the legend about the shadow. The tale of a drinking stone is shared with megalith's far and wide, but the shadow story isn't. Can you provide a reference for the source of this information please, as it doesn't appear in any of the quoted references. Maen Llia is a particular interest of mine. Beaconsfan (talk) 19:54, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

D.J.James in an article in volume XVIII (1978-79) of the periodical Brycheiniog (p19) states that the stone is supposed to visit the Neath River when it hears the cock crow. He references that tale as being listed by M. Phillips in the 1933 publication The Folklore of the Afan and Margam District. A BBC television programme Secret Britain: Water World of Wales (http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02lr7sr) on aspects of the Brecon Beacons National Park filmed in 2014 and aired in 2015 explored the extension of the stone's shadow at the summer sunset down to the stream some tens of metres to its east. The shadow was seen by viewers to achieve that whereas a journey to the Neath (actually the Nedd Fechan would involve crossing nearby Fan Nedd into the next valley. cheers Geopersona (talk) 17:56, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it priceless that this BBC series thought that the stone was "secret" whereas this article says it's only 30 yards from a minor road and a tourist attraction! Mind you they did their best to keep it secret by not actually mentioning the name of the stone or anything about the location other than that it was in the Brecon Beacons area. Nevermind the presenters had a nice day out and got paid for it. (this text added by 86.140.127.11 on 14 Feb 2016)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maen Llia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110611094214/http://www.brecon-beacons.com/archaelogy-Sarn-Helen-Maen-Madoc-Maen-Llia.htm to http://www.brecon-beacons.com/archaelogy-Sarn-Helen-Maen-Madoc-Maen-Llia.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:00, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]