Talk:Madonna wannabe

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Madonna wannabe article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 21, 2015	Articles for deletion	Kept

Madonna Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Madonna, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Madonna on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MadonnaWikipedia:WikiProject MadonnaTemplate:WikiProject MadonnaMadonna articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

2007-02-7 Automated pywikipediabot message

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 10:32, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism allegations against Madonna

This section no contains reputable sources. So, can become a primary source. Meanwhile, I think it best to erase it, for not there are reputable sources. Best regards, Chrishonduras (talk) 04:40, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This section actually contains a very "reputable" source. This section is the most well sourced of the entire article. If you want to help, start by correcting the many uncounted claims in the rest of the article! Thanks! "Best regards" Thisbird (talk) 09:39, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No proceed. very "reputable" source is a fallacy. Are these two major websites that BBC, Time, The New York Times or Allmusic?. Well you're wrong in every way. Regardless, that information can not be with these two references to unreliable, because it will become a primary source. Best regards, Chrishonduras (talk) 15:38, 6 February 2013 (UTC) P.S: Yeah, I'm helping to put references.[reply]

Expansion

References are fine to me, but the whole article can be expanded a lot more. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 04:04, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IndianBio, nice to meet you. Is true: "the article can be expanded a lot more". With a simple search on Google Books can find some ( comments from some authors on this phenomenon). I have links from example: Yahoo Spain [1] or this excellent source by Los Angeles Times (1985) and/or maybe, this from People 1987. Best regards, Chrishonduras (talk) 03:53, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Goodies, so we can work on it more. I have seen a few books also tailoring how the style came into ecxistence. Lemme check out the links you posted. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 04:04, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

Listing references for expansion. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 09:23, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Madonna wannabe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151002153124/http://www.boyculture.com/boy_culture/2010/02/return-to-madonnaland.html to http://www.boyculture.com/boy_culture/2010/02/return-to-madonnaland.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:12, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]