Talk:Madlib Medicine Show
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
I think the info boxes should be removed MarcelloRubini (talk) 18:15, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
THIS IS STUPID
[edit]there's nothing here but track lists, and the track lists for #2, 4, 6 and 8 are 100% inaccurate! 75.2.136.41 (talk) 16:55, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
AGREED! Why was this page created? These are all separate albums that were once on the Madlib Discography where they belong, because they're all distinct albums. Now the discography just lists a single album "Madlib Medicine Show" that came out in January 2010, which doesn't accurately describe Madlib's work this year. THIS IS STUPID
- I added the "notability" tag to the top of the article for this reason. I'm not familiar with this guy's work, but is this group of albums REALLY a "series," or just a bunch of stuff released in rapid succession? The question is whether the "series" is notable when each release may or may not qualify for its own article. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:48, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- So you admittedly have no idea what this music is, but put the header up because...? Despite the episodic nature of the albums, each stands on its own as a quality release. I'm not so sure they do or don't illicit their own pages, I think one is good for the sake of not installing 12 mixed albums to additionally navigate through in the chronology. They definitely stand strong as a set and their notability pretty evident if you listen. Pixel Eater (talk) 23:07, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
AGREED ALSO. & it's correct that track lists for 2,4,6,8 and now 10 are incorrect. 75.83.129.13 (talk) 15:03, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Encyclopedia?
[edit]easily the most unencyclopedic article i've read here in some time... 173.66.12.79 (talk) 01:07, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Hash
[edit]Is there a reason for using hash marks (#) instead of "No." as is printed on most covers? Pixel Eater (talk) 23:08, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
The Quotes? No Citations
[edit]There's quotes listed under every title but it's unclear where they're from. This is an awful page. 75.83.129.13 (talk) 15:05, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
File:MadlibMS6.jpeg Nominated for speedy Deletion
[edit]
An image used in this article, File:MadlibMS6.jpeg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 9 October 2011
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:39, 9 October 2011 (UTC) |
File:MadlibMS10.jpeg Nominated for speedy Deletion
[edit]
An image used in this article, File:MadlibMS10.jpeg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 9 October 2011
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:39, 9 October 2011 (UTC) |
File:MadlibMS11.jpeg Nominated for speedy Deletion
[edit]
An image used in this article, File:MadlibMS11.jpeg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 9 October 2011
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:39, 9 October 2011 (UTC) |
File:MadlibMS12.jpeg Nominated for speedy Deletion
[edit]
An image used in this article, File:MadlibMS12.jpeg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 9 October 2011
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:39, 9 October 2011 (UTC) |