Talk:Mademoiselle de Scuderi

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	It is requested that a picture or pictures be included in this article to improve its quality.

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Personal essaying

This is plainly a personal-opinion essay whose author draws many individual conclusions, offers various observations and argues positions on conflicting critical theories, all without citation. There are a few scattered references in the piece, but it lacks any endnotes. The "plot summary" is excessively detailed. Jtcarpet (talk) 01:47, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cardillac-Syndrome

First of all: the link concerning the "Cardillac Syndrome" is dead, it should read "http://www.jf-archiv.de/archiv00/350yy40.htm" in order to work. Secondly, the link refers to a not quite relevant article in "Junge Freiheit", which is an ultra-conservative (to say the least) weekly newspaper and thus far from being an objective source. And thirdly: No psychologist I ever spoke to, no database or psychological dictionary I ever consulted mentions this syndrome at all. If anyone can refer to some source that is not redirected to Wiki I would be glad to believe this myth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.188.6.12 (talk) 21:28, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mademoiselle de Scuderi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071022072930/http://romantik.litera-tor.com/texte/hoff_scuderi01.html to http://www.romantik.litera-tor.com/texte/hoff_scuderi01.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:49, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]