Talk:Helena Blavatsky

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on August 12, 2017, May 8, 2018, May 8, 2022, May 8, 2023, and May 8, 2024.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Occult High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: Science & education / Religion / Demographics & ethnography High‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the science and education in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the religion in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the demographics and ethnography of Russia task force.

Ukraine High‑importance

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion: New religious movements Top‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as Top-importance).

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Religion High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Helena Blavatsky was copied or moved into Theosophy (Boehmian) with this edit on 15:13, 2014-08-18. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by .

Category:Miracle workers

@Toughpigs, MagicatthemovieS, and Lute88: can you guys explain the edit conflict I'm seeing on the page? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 20:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's fairly straightforward. MagicatthemovieS added the category Miracle workers to the page. I thought it was inappropriate, because Blavatsky was not an actual miracle worker. MagicaatthemovieS reverted back, explaining that the category is not necessarily for actual "miracle workers". That seems like a fairly pointless and confusing category to me, but whatever, I'll let it go.

Then Lute88 reverted the category again; I'm not sure why. Toughpigs (talk) 21:04, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you're saying in that its potentially a confusing category... But I don't think that its meant to say that Blavatsky was an actual miracle worker, I expect that you two agree on that. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 21:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the explanation on the category implies that "magicians" and "saints" are real, and can perform "magic" or "wonderworking". There's nothing on the category page that says it's actually a category of frauds and quacks like Blavatsky. I don't know why we have such a credulous category that seems to say these people were "miracle workers" in wikivoice. Toughpigs (talk) 21:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thats fair and categories usually don't have extended bits like that so I have removed it. I think we're pretty clear that miracles aren't real in a scientific sense. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 21:23, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This category is for anyone who supposedly performed miracles, including Jesus, Moses, Muhammad, etc. Blavatsky was purported to perform miracles. As long as the category exists, she belongs in it. MagicatthemovieS (talk) 21:25, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More fundamentally, I don't see very clear support in the article text for this Category - there are just two instances of "Miracle Club"? Why is the category not called "Alleged miracle workers"? Martinevans123 (talk) 21:26, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the history and talk page of the category, you can see that it was originally called "Wonderworkers", and was intended to be a category for Christian saints. I guess the concept broadened when the category's name was changed to "Miracle workers", and is now a catch-all for religious figures as well as frauds. Toughpigs (talk) 21:32, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair seperating those two in a NPOV sense doesn't seem possible. Miracles are fraudulent as normally understood, they're just in general not evaluated by rational scientific standards... By such standards they're frauds/lies/myths. Blavatsky is unambiguously a religious figure after all. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 21:35, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have we reached a concensus? MagicatthemovieS (talk) 03:05, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think we have consensus to include provided that more is actually said in the article about her being a miracle worker. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:23, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]