Talk:Madagascar (1837 ship)

	Australia portal Madagascar (1837 ship) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian maritime history (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Madagascar (1837 ship)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

It could use an infobox.Pustelnik (talk) 00:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 00:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 22:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Alternative Facts

I have written an ebook The Silent Moon that is based on 25 years of research into these matters. What is reported on this page about the ship is according to my research totally incorrect. I will if I can find a way correct these errors in coming months. I will state at this stage that a key member of the escort robbery was left on board and authorities have attempted to cover this up. Primary source material is available at my website that supports this fact.Redbacks Again (talk) 23:13, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, no, you can not use your own research based on primary sources, and you can not use your own web site and self-published book as sources - you would be violating both WP:OR and WP:RS. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]