Talk:Mad Doctor X

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Tone

The tone of this article is absurdly chatty. Whoever did it, please stop. I'll go through and change things when I have time. Malick78 (talk) 20:52, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was tempted to go in and try to fix this ridiculous article but talk about daunting. It reads like it was copy-pasted from a particularly obnoxious music magazine. Atypicaloracle (talk) 13:35, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Woah, lets not be chatty eh? Let's have a serious academic study of my music because I took it so seriously it deserves to have a solemn, dry tone. Also, as it was supposed to be a parady of those obnoxious magazines, you shouldn't be allowed to go anywhere near it to edit it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monty Propps (talk • contribs) 22:09, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles in Wikipedia are part of an encyclopedia, and as such, should have an encyclopedic tone. See WP:MOS and WP:TONE for details, but in general, articles should be written in a "businesslike" manner, and most of this article is far from it. --Darkwind (talk) 02:13, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm now that this article has been edited it seems to consist of nothing, apart from the mad doctors discography which can be found at discogs. And because the only text still remaining is so brief this article is worse off that when it started which is a shame.— Preceding unsigned comment added by SkankSinatra (talk • contribs) 12:45, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Paraphrasing

The lead needs to be completely rewritten - most of it is almost word-for-word from the label's bio. --Darkwind (talk) 02:13, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.kudosrecords.co.uk/index.php?page=detail&product=MARCD006. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:05, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Mad Doctor X. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:56, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notability Check on this Article

Can somebody take a look at the sources of this article? I can only seem to find two here, which would not be enough per WP:GNG. Allan Nonymous (talk) 11:53, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]