Jump to content

Talk:Mad Cow-Girl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Politician?

[edit]

Politican?! Er, no. Delete without prejudice!! doktorb wordsdeeds 06:59, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Collecting more details for this Politician

[edit]

Steps to improve this page should include:

  • Looking for (or requesting) an open source picture.
  • Gathering even more evidence of noteability for the sceptics out there.
  • Collecting more biographic information relevent to her political life.
  • As she is the archivist, we need to examine that archive.

Together we can make this a productive page, useful for people to seeking to understand this persion both as a candidate and exemplar of the OMRLP. The Surrealist Historian (talk) 09:53, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There was quite a good profile of Mad Cow-Girl in the Sunderland Echo[1] from Friday, 15th April 2005. I'll drop her a line to see if she has a photo she could release into an open source environment such as Flickr.--91.106.39.78 (talk) 11:06, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I also find an exclusive interview with the Sunderland Echo[2] on Friday, 1st June 2001--91.106.39.78 (talk) 11:14, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OMRLP very kindly provided an image, which I have now added. I have forwarded their permission to publish it to WikiCommons.--91.106.28.32 (talk) 12:34, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was just coming back to report that I may have an outside chance of getting an image of Mad Cow-Girl soon but I'm delighted to see that this is in hand. I've been tracking news items while I've been away from the Wikipedia. The Sunderland Echo has expressed local affection for her [3] and the Daily Record [4] has declared for her. Both these profiles make clear that her noteability is not linked to her polling statistics. This is pretty consistant picture that the Telegraph's Three Line Whip blogger has also confirmed. The Surrealist Historian (talk) 18:45, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like we are uncovering more and more source material which can be added in to the article. I think having a national newspaper declare their support for someone must end any question about notability. I'll add a comment to the AfD discussion, and when I get time I'll add some more background into the article.--91.106.28.32 (talk) 19:23, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

[edit]

I draw editors attention to the following deletion log (Deletion log); 18:39 . . PhilKnight (Talk | contribs) deleted "Madcow (politican)" (WP:PROD, reason was non-notable joke candidate)

doktorb wordsdeeds 22:31, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think a deletion log will tell us much about Mad Cow-Girl. A log is just a piece of technical apparatus used within some application or another.--91.104.20.23 (talk) 11:50, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, but it does show that another article about MadCow has already been deleted for her being non-notable doktorb wordsdeeds 16:53, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Spelling mistake and duplication is most credible reason for deletion.86.137.245.217 (talk) 19:06, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1961-2010?

[edit]

There have been edits about the death of Mad Cow-Girl. I am trying to find a good source for this. Her own page implies she had died without explicity saying it. Anybody got a good source? Bevo74 (talk) 19:22, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing on Google News today. Perhaps it might be worth checking the websites of local newspapers? Skomorokh 19:24, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madcowgirl02b.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Madcowgirl02b.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Madcowgirl02b.JPG)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:38, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mad Cow-Girl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:35, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mad Cow-Girl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:03, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]