Talk:Macteens

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Reworking

Macteens is undergoing extensive maintenance including a redesign and a masthead change. I'll slowly be updating the page over the next week or so. Wndrby 20:36, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PROD Removed, Improving Article

I've removed the prod template from this page. Macteens is notable on the Mac-web, and I will improve this article so it better fits the needs of Wikipedia website poicy. However, criteria has already been met for this article, so it should stand on its own.

With that, criteria used for its proposed deletion (Alexa) is ineffecitve, as it only samples Windows MSIE users, which is highly problematic for a site that targets teenage Mac users. Macteens is notable enough to be admitted into industry events as media, so it should be notable enough for an entry into Wikipedia. As I said earlier, I'll be working on this article. Spasm321 00:02, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Importance

I've applied an importance tag on this page. An assertion on an article talk page is very different from including conclusive proof (ie links to major media coverage etc.) of passing WP:WEB in the main article. Failure to do so could lead to an AfD. Please do not assume that because of gaining entry to an event this should be good enough for WP, WP has its own completely independent criteria. Please do not remove the notice until such proof has been provided. I've also removed redlinks, per WP:REDBLUE. Deizio 01:06, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Slightly disappointed by the removal of the tag with no assertion of notability or importance, or explanation here. The 3 links provided are to 1) Your own archive, 2) A blog (who cares if a blog references a newspaper? we need the newspaper) and 3) A lycos online news nugget from 2003 which is about a different website. None of this satisfies WP criteria, just because there is more content and the article looks nice, doesn't mean you have "arrived". I'm not going to take on the Mac world by nominating this as I don't know enough about it but I would be interested to see what would happen. Deizio 02:02, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still working on this, trying to find more uses that fit the notability requirements on WP. I figured I'd throw up what I had written, but perhaps I shouldn't have removed the tag. Feel free to re-add, though, and others (or myself) work on this soon. On the note of the link referencing the Baltimore Sun, I admit it sure isn't compelling, but the link to the article isn't currently available. Chris Saribay 18:50, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet, and I also noted your acceptance of your bio page being deleted so I'm happy you have an idea of what's expected. The systemic bias issue - essentially that web stuff seems more at home here because WP is also on the web - is something I take quite seriously, hence I like to make sure that stuff like this fits the rules. I'll leave off with the tagging for now (of course you never know what others are going to do) given your willingness to make it happen. Cheers Deizio 19:19, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Abandoned

It should be noted that the site is pretty much abandoned, and even one of the mods is pretty much done with it and no longer even cleans up the spambots. It's a ghost town now. Brandon 06:23, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Macteens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20010401224649/http://macteens.com/ to http://macteens.com/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928091921/http://teenlug.com/ to http://teenlug.com/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20010401224649/http://macteens.com/ to http://macteens.com/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070728050555/http://macteens.com/forums/ to http://macteens.com/forums

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:18, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]