Talk:Macroharmony

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: IMO this should be merged into the Dmitri Tymoczko article. The term is one promulgated by one individual and all of the cites/sources are a single book written by him. IMO its a neologism which does meet the wp:notability requirement for such. Suggest that the merge would best be done by the creator. Happy editing!

North8000 (talk) 19:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

added some, still need to work from Daniel Harrison and could probably include more from Neil Newton and Ciro Scotto MONTENSEM (talk) 04:53, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's more conversation regarding this at User_talk:MONTENSEM North8000 (talk) 12:28, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'm leaning toward going the more general, concept-focused route. There appears to be enough literature to sustain that approach, and it may result in renaming the article (and in taking a harder look at the unified field article). This needs much more still, but I will keep it going in the cracks of my time. I think @User:Aza24 is very right to suggest an article on Tymoczko's Geometry. That's just more than I want to take on or commit to at present. But I may get there later. I may do it simultaneously or along the way. In the meantime, I've put in some little edits to Tymoczko's page. I may work on his bibliography there some, too. MONTENSEM (talk) 07:09, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I also tried to improve Tymoczko's page a little, but it leaves a lot to be wanted Aza24 (talk) 00:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]