Talk:MV Geysir/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Arsenikk ^(talk) 12:01, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Avoid entity suffixes (such as LLC) when referring to company (with exceptions of when differentiating a company from its product, such as Google and Google, Inc.) Similar with Noro (should be at least piped).

Question: There is a potential ambiguity between two separate business entities: TransAtlantic Lines LLC and TransAtlantic Lines Iceland. I'm open to changing it, but it was there for a reason. Haus^Talk 12:30, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, either way is fine then. Arsenikk ^(talk) 11:51, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All values need conversion to imperial units (easy with {{convert}}). This includes the infobox.

Done.

' Madisonville, Louisiana' should be linked.

Done.

DWT should be spelled out.

Done.

Please avoid external links in the body. Either have them as references or external links at the end.

Moved external link inside citation.

There has been a recent change to the MOS, so instead of writing "NOK 6,000,000", it should now be "6,000,000 Norwegian krone (NOK)"... and then use NOK for later appearances.

Done. Since NOK is not used elsewhere in the article, I omitted the (NOK) part. Haus^Talk 12:33, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Sparebank 1 SR-Bank" has its own article (which is distinct from "Sparebank 1")

Done.

Link "Norwegian Ship Register" (and fix the naming). The links (in the references) are named "Register", not "Registry" (and they both have articles).

Done.

The English name for Skipsregistrene is Norwegian Ship Registers.

Changed in cites.

That being said, I don't seem to get any useful information out of those references, all I get is a generic search field.

It looks like it is impossible to link directly to the individual pages. Instead, I've appended instructions in the references section on how to fill out the search form to pull up the three records of interest.

The second external link is dead.

Fixed.

Placing article on hold. Arsenikk ^(talk) 12:01, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing, Arsenikk. I think I've addressed your concerns. Cheers. Haus^Talk 11:22, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations with a good article Arsenikk ^(talk) 11:51, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]