Talk:MV Celtic (1903)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Period around mid-1970s

I have some further information about MV Celtic which I will post here as soon as I can. She was owned and operated by my stepfather as "Grant Shipping Lines Ltd", and he has information on her engines, routes, captains over a five year period in the mid-1970s. I'm thrilled to see a Wikipedia page about her; I spent many happy days on the Celtic as a boy. Daen (talk) 16:38, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Build/launch dates - 1903 or 1908?

According to the link to the Lloyd's Register, Celtic wasn't built until 1908. Anyone know where the 1903 build/launch date in the article came from? Daen (talk) 15:55, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, I can see now, comparing to the earlier copy, it's just a badly-scanned '3' - my bad Daen (talk) 15:58, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]