Talk:MS Westerdam
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Images
[edit]Currently, the second image in the article is an additional exterior shot, which doesn't really add anything beyond what is already illustrated by the main image in the infobox. To better illustrate the prior Westerdams, there is a photo of a model of one of the earlier ships to carry that name available at commons:File:Ms westerdam.JPG. Alternately, another option for the second image could be an interior image (several available ones are already on the commons at Commons:Category:Westerdam (ship, 2004)) - however, as I'm the one who uploaded several of those interior image, I wanted to see if there's consensus for a change, and if so a preference for which one to use. My opinion is that the shot of the Atrium would be the best interior shot option, but would be interested in other opinions. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 02:45, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- For the section "Past Westerdam ships", I found an image which better illustrates the ship (instead of the model linked above): commons:File:Westerdam at Ft. Lauderdale, Florida.jpg. Unless there's an objection, I'll replace the current image in that section with this one later this week (the existing image in that section is of the current ship, and is partially obscured by the Maasdam). --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:17, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- As no other comments were made, I've been bold and changed the image in the section for "Past Westerdam ships" to now be an image of a past ship using the name Westerdam. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:46, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on MS Westerdam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110611232433/http://www.hollandamerica.com/assets/news/FastFacts_Westerdam.pdf to http://www.hollandamerica.com/assets/news/FastFacts_Westerdam.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110514232143/http://www.adn.com/2011/05/11/1858168/cruise-ship-hits-fixed-ice-some.html to http://www.adn.com/2011/05/11/1858168/cruise-ship-hits-fixed-ice-some.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110611232216/http://www.hollandamerica.com/assets/news/FastFacts_VistaName.pdf to http://www.hollandamerica.com/assets/news/FastFacts_VistaName.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:40, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:51, 21 February 2020 (UTC)