Talk:MS Sobieski

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / British / European / Polish / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Polish military history task force
	World War II task force

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on MS Sobieski. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100609184625/http://www.theshipslist.com:80/ships/descriptions/ShipsSS.html to http://www.theshipslist.com/ships/descriptions/ShipsSS.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:55, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Its getting REALLY tedious that certain people in Wikipedia think that "the Shipslist" is original content. In fact it is very often copied from some of the best experts in the shipping space and NOT attributed by the shipslist. That does not make the shipslist the owner of the copyright.

In the historic liner space there are three experts that stand head and shoulders above the rest and they are Nicholas Bonsor, Arnold Kludas and John Maxtone-Graham.

I cited two of these authors. The shipslist lifted information from these sources. What's more I added a lot of additional information and reorganised what is one of the poorest written articles in the liner category. Please note that Polish Ocean Lines was only formed after the ship had been sold to the Russians (another detail not mentioned) so it never belonged to that line. Indeed the image refers to the Gruziya and yet the text does not. And then there is the issue that the source cited for the passenger numbers in each class does NOT even match the numbers in that source. Tsk, tsk....

You really need to lift your game if you are claiming to be an arbiter on the subject of shipping, which I have been studying since the 1970s.

Beyond that, I am a qualified librarian and I know my literary copyright. I am getting tired of the bar-room (copyright) lawyers roaming loose in here.

I would note that this site here: http://www.tynebuiltships.co.uk/S-Ships/sobieski1939.html has all the data that is supposedly the "copyright" of theshipslist. I would also note it has the correct name of the shipping company whereas the wikipedia article does not. Does this imply that the shipslist took the data from here? No, in reality the metrics of the ship are what they are and NO-ONE owns the fact the ship was launched in a certain year or was so many metres long. Once again brush up your copyright law...

What you CANNOT DO here is copy or closely paraphase the words that other sources use (even if the source you are copying it from has copied it from someone else). While data (i.e. lengths etc) is not copyrightable, the words used to express them is - you need to use your own words when expanding an article and not someone else's (and do not claim other peoples work as your own as you are doing with some of your photo uploads.Nigel Ish (talk) 09:53, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]