Talk:MSNBC controversies

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the MSNBC controversies article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page is not a forum for general discussion about MSNBC controversies. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about MSNBC controversies at the Reference desk.

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Television Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Media Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Journalism Mid‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Television Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Orphaned references in MSNBC Controversies

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of MSNBC Controversies's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "msnbc.msn.com":

From Dick Armey: "Rachel Maddow Show". MSNBC. Retrieved 2010-08-18.
From Contessa Brewer: "Contessa Brewer – Meet the faces of MSNBC", msnbc.com, February 22, 2007, retrieved July 20, 2011
From MSNBC: Msnbc to ‘lean forward’ in two-year brand campaign MSNBC Retrieved 2010-10-13

Reference named "washingtonpost.com":

From Chris Matthews: Kurtz, Howard (2008-01-18). "Chris Matthews Backs Off 'Nasty' Remark on Clinton". washingtonpost.com. Retrieved 2010-02-23.
From MSNBC: Kurtz, Howard (2008-09-08). "MSNBC Drops Olbermann, Matthews as News Anchors". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2008-09-30.

Reference named "NYT":

From Imus in the Morning: Bill Carter (2007-04-12). "NBC News Drops Imus Show Over Racial Remark". The New York Times. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
From MSNBC: Cable Channel Nods to Ratings and Leans Left. The New York Times. Published November 6, 2007. Retrieved August 24, 2008.
From Project for Excellence in Journalism: Brian Stelter (October 12, 2011). "Occupy Wall Street Occupies Headlines" (Media Deoder blog). The New York Times. Retrieved November 21, 2011.
From Sarah Palin: Bumiller, Elizabeth; Cooper, Michael (August 31, 2008). "Conservative Ire Pushed McCain From Lieberman". New York Times. p. A26. Retrieved 2009-09-06.
From Bill Clinton: Van Natta, Don, Jr. (June 28, 1999). "Dinner for a Presidential Library, Contributions Welcome". The New York Times. The New York Times Company. Retrieved December 17, 2009.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
From Howard Kurtz: Peters, Jeremy (5 October 2010). "Longtime Washington Post Writer Heads to The Daily Beast". The New York Times. Retrieved 5 October 2010.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:50, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MSNBC 2008 logo.svg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:MSNBC 2008 logo.svg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests May 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:MSNBC 2008 logo.svg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:25, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Video/Audio Editing Controversies

What are people's thoughts on adding Video/Audio Editing Controversies?

MSNBC played an edited portion (edited by an NBC Affiliate of the Zimmerman 911 calls which made Zimmerman sound racist. In an exclusive sit-down interview with Sandusky it has been reported that NBC left out what appears to be an admission of guilt. "MSNBC Misrepresents Romney Speech, Invents Wawa ‘Gaffe’" nymag.com msnbc-misquotes-romney-invents-wawa-gaffe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Viewmont Viking (talk • contribs) 17:06, 19 June 2012 (UTC) The Romney chant fail is not an edit. The SOLE REASON Romney stops the chant is to remind crowd to include Romney's name in the chant. http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/82814897/ Andyisbell (talk) 01:17, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Controversies or just criticisms?

I'd like to do a major edit to this page either removing some of the sections or changing the title and separating criticisms from controversies. The first two "controversies" listed cite no sources that the criticism is controversial. Does anyone deny that MSNBC is left-leaning? Does MSNBC even deny that? It may be a criticism, but without real citations to disagreement it's not a controversy. Does anyone disagree? Branei (talk) 18:50, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on MSNBC controversies. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://thehill.com/in-the-know/clinton-confidant-dismisses-msnbc-as-no-longer-fair-and-balanced-2008-05-05.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:14, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on MSNBC controversies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:47, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on MSNBC controversies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:11, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MSNBC Banned from Rittenhouse Trial by Judge

I have removed an inappropriate comment here. This is not a general forum for discussing the topic or for laughing at MSNBC. This does, however, appear to be a notable event and, if someone who edits this page is interested in doing so, it is likely appropriate for inclusion in this article. Here is coverage from CNN, AP, The Hill, and the New York Times - these links may be useful for anyone looking to add this content to the article. Short version: a driver was pulled over for running a red light while following the bus carrying the Rittenhouse jury. He claimed to work for MSNBC and gave the name of his supervisor. MSNBC says he is a "freelancer". The judge banned MSNBC from the courthouse for the duration of the trial. --B (talk) 19:16, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Controversies

Their are some recent contiveres such as MSNBC deceptively editing clips of Donald Trump. Is that somthing we want to put up or is it to recent? https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/4548333-trump-episode-shows-why-the-news-industry-is-suffering-a-bloodbath/ Nameofuser1 (talk) 01:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]