Talk:MOMA, Wales

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Museums Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

NPOV?

The article reads more like an advertisment than an encyclopaedia article; probably because it was written by the founder of the institution in question. Probably just needs the peacock terms - "perfect acoustics", "justly been described as..." toned down somewhat. Archfalhwyl 12:37, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agree entirely. Would be very grateful if impartial observer could remove any value judgements. Diolch, Archfalhwyl. User:ANDREW LAMBERT 12.43, 17 March 2006

Well, I've had a go. Just like to say that personally I agree with all the statements in the original text, it's a marvellous place, but we can't have NPOV articles here :) Archfalhwyl 12:50, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, Archfalhwyl. I fully accept what you say. I am grateful to you for your kind words. User:ANDREW LAMBERT 12.55, 17 March 2006

Dim problem. That was me who removed the POV-check tag, by the way - I just forgot to log in. Archfalhwyl 14:37, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on MOMA, Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]