Talk:M939 series 5-ton 6×6 truck

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Trucks C‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trucks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of trucks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TrucksWikipedia:WikiProject TrucksTemplate:WikiProject TrucksTrucks articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

The inter-languages link to de: 5-Ton-Truck was deleted

1. The name of the German article de: 5-Ton-Truck is not equivalent to the names of other articles (pl:M939, ru:M939, sv:M939). “5-Ton-Truck” is a type (a class) of trucks, and the family M939 is only a representative of this truck type as, for example, the family M809 is.

2. The contents of the article de: 5-Ton-Truck is not equivalent to the contents of the articles pl:M939, ru:M939, sv:M939. The article de: 5-Ton-Truck tells about M809 truck family, the articles in Polish, Russian and Swedish Wikipedias tell about M939 truck family. Also pay attention: there is “a red link” de:M939 in the Germany articles de: 5-Ton-Truck

Dmitry I. Ivanov (talk) 19:03, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

images 14Mar14

I used "USMC M923 (6X6) 5-ton cargo truck" in the infobox because I think it is more representive, and I like LF 1/4 shots on LHD vehicles. That was the only pic that had a location, and it could be political, it's out.

How can you tell that ""U.S. Marine Corps M923" is an A1 and not an A2? No other suffixs anyway.Sammy D III (talk) 17:12, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is "globalsecurity.org" good?

What is wrong with globalsecurity.org? The second half of the linked page specifically addresses safety, certainly the source for the entire section. Everything except “would "lock up" in 2nd gear” is covered.

I didn’t do safety, but have used globalsecurity.org regularly. Their numbers match other sources, I believe they are very good. Sammy D III (talk) 20:07, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Inches to feet

I have been told that feet are easier than inches for many people. Sammy D III (talk) 03:23, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Name 21 Dec 2016

I am thinking of changing the name to "M939 Series 5-ton 6x6 truck". Sammy D III (talk) 04:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seating

The picture shows two people in the cab. Can a third person sit between them? 104.153.40.58 (talk) 17:58, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]