Talk:M274 ½-ton 4×4 utility platform truck

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

1 Jul 2017 name

I'm thinking of re-naming this article "M274 1⁄2-ton 4x4 Utility Platform Truck". I have been doing a common theme at "Category:Military trucks of the United States", pre and WWII trucks by their manufacturer's name, post war with their "M" numbers first (most post-WWII trucks are Ordinance Standard with anyone building anything). "Utility Platform Truck" is a proper name. I don't usually do more than "truck", but "Utility Platform" gives the readers an idea of what this unusual vehicle is. Objections? Sammy D III (talk) 15:21, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sammy D III: I'd be very surprised if anyone objects to the rename. Two minor details: I believe that the half character (½) and proper multiplication sign (×) should be used. Other than that, go ahead. RadiculousJ (talk) 17:35, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]