Talk:M18 recoilless rifle

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States / World War II / Cold War C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Dubious

The statement that an adequate supply of M18's and HEAT ammunition could have stopped NKA T-34/85's in 1950 is very questionable, given the armor penetration of the M18 and the armor protection of the T-34. The tanks could have perhaps stopped by flank and rear shots, but these kind of shots take very steady nerves on the part of the infantry. W. B. Wilson (talk) 17:58, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the paragraph in question as it has been directly copied from the rt66.com page on the M18 -- copyright violation. W. B. Wilson (talk) 18:39, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Penetration

Sorry, first real Wikipedia edit. The HEAT round was 2.5-3 inches penetration and used a hemispherical liner to reduce the penetration loss from rotation. Also, the M1A1 was a launcher, not a rocket, and the M6A1 and M6A3 rockets its fired did not have 120mm penetration. The M6A1 was 3 inches and M6A3 4 inches. Only the M6A4/A5 rockets did better, and the only source for M6A5 performance (OP 1720) is mostly illegible.--MandolinMagi (talk) 02:25, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on M18 recoilless rifle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:23, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

57mm.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:06, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]