Jump to content

Talk:MOLLE

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:M.O.L.L.E.)

MOLLE II

[edit]

I think it should be mentioned in this article if it doesn't deserve one for itself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.227.117.239 (talk) 11:24, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move to MOLLE

[edit]

Rationale

[edit]
Several guidelines try to systematise certain types of article titles, for example article titles using abbreviations:
This suggests to me that MOLLE sans abbreviating periods is the more appropriate title. Blackcap | talk 07:44, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Voting

[edit]

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~

Discussion

[edit]

Add any additional comments.

Related policy: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (acronyms). Blackcap | talk 07:44, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Note that A.L.I.C.E. (which had the same thing) has been moved to ALICE. Blackcap (talk) 20:09, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"PAL"?

[edit]

What is "PAL"? I searched through Wikipedia, but couldn't find out what it relates to. -- Syzygy 12:40, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pocket Attachment Ladder System

Pronunciation

[edit]

Mole, or mo-lay? —Preceding unsigned comment added by John Bessa (talk • contribs) 16:39, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I heard it was pronoucned as Maul-ey like the girls name. Halofanatic333 (talk) 14:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Bianco Inc.

[edit]

Govt. Contractor or not? The article came out back in March, I figure someone's gotta know. As funny as it was when I read "probably not" then had to follow the tab down to see "350 in custody after New Bedford immigration raid"... it just doesn't look very encyclopedic to "guess" is all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.45.185.196 (talk) 02:35, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Generations, diff't frames

[edit]

I have been researching, and Ebay surplus suppl'rs are advertising "Gen IV," which implies Gens I-III.

Independent manufacturers are extending the designs as well, making lighter, more sensible frames.

My own take from backpacking is that the belt system is the weakness -- the load should ride on the hips, except when the belt is released, which means the load is about to get dumped ("Always protect your head," McCullen).--John Bessa (talk) 19:19, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I had an interchange with Justin from Downeast, the maker of the most advanced plastic frame. He gave me a lot of useful information, though I didn't get permission to use the company's photos of its products. Here is a link to the relevant parts of the conversation. I personally am not a MOLLE fan after researching it, especially through Ebay (surplus heaven), but I did find I like the ALICE system. I noticed that the Viet Cong copied the ALICE pack during the war, but not it's worthless frame.

While going back and forth with Justin, I gave the whole topic a single-systems analysis (as you can see in the emails), and realized that pack systems are obsolete! The weight bearing unit has to be the body armor, and hence I coined " load-bearing body armor." I will make a stub for that page, but because it does not yet exist (to my knowledge), and talk about it is speculative, then it falls into the gray area of "original research." Not a problem -- I will make a wikiversity page were OR is encouraged.--John Bessa (talk) 14:45, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Picture

[edit]

Can we get a newer/better picture for the MOLLE System.

The one that we have now barely even shows what MOLLE is.

It's more suited for the ACU article rather tham a MOLLE one.

EDIT: Seems I thought MOLLE was the same exact thing as PAL, we still need a better pic

Halofanatic333 (talk) 14:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Evolution and criticism

[edit]

The last paragraph in this section referencing Blue Force gear reads like an advertisement. There are plenty of alternatives and improvements being made to molle gear by many competing companies, but I don't believe they all have a place in this article unless they become part of the molle standard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.83.3.122 (talk) 16:59, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on MOLLE. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:00, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:53, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:MOLLE&oldid=1204045515"