Talk:M-ratio

Gambling: Poker Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Poker (assessed as Low-importance).

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Original Research

isn't telling how to play optimally in each zone impartial and opinionated?--Chiyocide 05:24, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're a little bit confused. First, you mean "partial", not "impartial". Secondly, if you're concerned that it's "partial and opinionated", that would be an WP:NPOV conflict (violation of neutrality) rather than a WP:OR conflict (original research, new, unsourced ideas). Thirdly, the "offending" section is clearly attributed to Dan Harrington. Next time, if you're not certain, please just make a comment on the talk page - someone will find it. Placing tags on the article itself when you're not certain what they mean just dilutes their value. Stevage 06:56, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The greater than or equal to symbols are not correct in the article. If no one objects I will fix them

Effective M?

Anyone feel like adding a little bit about Effective M? I'll do it myself if I can work out how to make formulas work...

DoktorDec 12:22, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Term vs concept

There is some disagreement about whether Magriel "invented" the M-factor, since Brunson described it in Super/System but did not give it a name. I edited the page to say that Magriel invented the term but Brunson wrote about the concept previously. Someone objected that if Brunson wrote about it, Magriel couldn't have invented it. True, in a sense. Perhaps we should say that Magriel "coined" the term (is that factually accurate?). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.84.19.38 (talk) 22:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Someone made an edit that refers to Brunson's description as a "more general concept of stack to blind ratio." That's not really correct, as the discussion in Super/System is very specific as to the ratio between blinds+antes to stack size, exactly the same as the M-ratio (just not by that name). Also, if the claim is going to be made that other authors described it, those need to be referenced specifically. As far as I know Brunson was the first and most widely read, by a wide margin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.84.19.38 (talk) 04:22, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Haven't read S/S, but IMHO for Brunson to get the credit he would need to define the ratio, and give specific bands with specific strategies like <5, >10 etc as Magriel has done. That was the particular insight Magriel had. Stevage 07:55, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Significance of M

Why not A, B or C instead? --Thelazyleo (talk) 03:12, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I guess the article's not that clear. Stands for Magriel, its inventor. Stevage 07:53, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on M-ratio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061207191306/http://www.blindbetpoker.com/books/harrington-holdem-2.html to http://www.blindbetpoker.com/books/harrington-holdem-2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:24, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]