Talk:M-80 (Michigan highway)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: — P C B 00:26, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Does MSHD need a link? (I have a feeling I've been told in the past.)
No, it doesn't really need a link in the references. (No publishers need to be linked to be honest.) Imzadi 1979 → 01:03, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
I believe the location of the termini deserves mention in the RD. Also, the name of the air force base is not mentioned in the route description section.
The termini are in the RD. AFB name added. Imzadi 1979 → 01:03, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't the city name be inside? — P C B 02:57, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused. The termini are Kinross and Pickford township. That is what's stated in the RD. It's not uncommon to "round off" the location in the lead though, especially when townships aren't shown on most maps of the state. Imzadi 1979 → 03:25, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Putting article on hold for minor issues or questions.