Talk:M-19 (Michigan highway)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 00:40, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Good.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- References included where necessary.
- C. No original research:
- No original research found.
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- All major aspects of the topic have been covered.
- B. Focused:
- Article remains focused throughout.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- No bias found.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Article is stable.
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- All images used are tagged correctly.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Images are provided, appropriate, and have suitable captions.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 17:52, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
Comments
[edit]Everything is good, nothing needs to be fixed.--Dom497 (talk) 17:52, 22 June 2012 (UTC)