Jump to content

Talk:M-19 (Michigan highway)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 00:40, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Quality of article is good.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    Article complies with MoS.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Good.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    References included where necessary.
    C. No original research:
    No original research found.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    All major aspects of the topic have been covered.
    B. Focused:
    Article remains focused throughout.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    No bias found.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    Article is stable.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    All images used are tagged correctly.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Images are provided, appropriate, and have suitable captions.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 17:52, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]

Everything is good, nothing needs to be fixed.--Dom497 (talk) 17:52, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]